View all newsletters
Sign up for our free email newsletters

Fighting for quality news media in the digital age.

  1. News
May 20, 2009

Why does the BBC spend more on its web sites than all of our national newspapers put together?

By Peter Kirwan

To be honest, I’m not a great fan of the Economist. Using all of that superb brainpower to promote a predictable species of conventional wisdom has always seemed a bit like driving a Rolls Royce to your local Tesco.

There’s nothing terribly wrong with doing this. But it does make you look a bit arrogant. Occasionally, too, it can make you look like a bit of a twat.

So we come to this week’s edition of The Economist, which offers up 3,800 words on the future of the news business.

For anyone who has lived on Mars for the past three years, I guess this kind of thing is useful.

But for the rest of us, the revelation that Mail Online has ‘built a reputation for celebrity news’hardly qualifies as staggering. The suggestion that local news outlets are ‘ailing’as cars dealers ‘trim their advertising’can’t be described as revelatory.

Racing towards the end of the 3,800 words, I was feeling the familiar lack of excitement that often results from reading the Economist.

And then I ran across this reference to the UK’s media market:

Content from our partners
Free journalism awards for journalists under 30: Deadline today
MHP Group's 30 To Watch awards for young journalists open for entries
How PA Media is helping newspapers make the digital transition

The annual budget for the websites of the (state-owned) BBC was recently raised to £145m ($220m). According to Mr [Paul] Zwillenberg [of media consultancy OC&C], the total online spending of the country’s national newspapers is only £100m.

My first thought? Even if the Economist does deploy this information in throwaway fashion in third-last par of a 36-page story, I’ve got to admit that Rolls-Royces have their uses. Occasionally.

On this basis, I’ll tell the Economist what I would find useful. Instead of a recitation of various well-known facts about Big Media, a worthy subject for in-depth coverage would be that disparity between the BBC’s £145m and the £100m invested by everyone else.

Is this disparity a symptom of market failure? Or its cause? Or both? Should the situation be changed? If so, why? And how?

I’m genuinely unsure about all of these questions. What I do know is that the disparity is going to become increasingly harder to justify as the downturn continues.

Topics in this article :

Email pged@pressgazette.co.uk to point out mistakes, provide story tips or send in a letter for publication on our "Letters Page" blog

Select and enter your email address Weekly insight into the big strategic issues affecting the future of the news industry. Essential reading for media leaders every Thursday. Your morning brew of news about the world of news from Press Gazette and elsewhere in the media. Sent at around 10am UK time. Our weekly does of strategic insight about the future of news media aimed at US readers. A fortnightly update from the front-line of news and advertising. Aimed at marketers and those involved in the advertising industry.
  • Business owner/co-owner
  • CEO
  • COO
  • CFO
  • CTO
  • Chairperson
  • Non-Exec Director
  • Other C-Suite
  • Managing Director
  • President/Partner
  • Senior Executive/SVP or Corporate VP or equivalent
  • Director or equivalent
  • Group or Senior Manager
  • Head of Department/Function
  • Manager
  • Non-manager
  • Retired
  • Other
Visit our privacy Policy for more information about our services, how New Statesman Media Group may use, process and share your personal data, including information on your rights in respect of your personal data and how you can unsubscribe from future marketing communications.
Thank you

Thanks for subscribing.

Websites in our network