View all newsletters
Sign up for our free email newsletters

Fighting for quality news media in the digital age.

  1. Archive content
April 24, 2007updated 17 May 2007 11:30am

Union’s ‘completely ambivalent’ attitude to Clive Goodman jailing

By Press Gazette

NUJ members have voted to continue consulting the Department for Constitutional Affairs over privacy, in light of Clive Goodman's arrest and imprisonment.

Editor of The Journalist, Tim Gopsill, acknowledged that the union had mixed feelings and had not taken an active stance on campaigning for the release of Goodman, the News of the World royal correspondent who was sentenced in January to four months'

imprisonment for intercepting royal telephone messages.

Gopsill told the conference: "Clive Goodman is the first journalist to be sentenced to prison in Britain for 44 years. You would have expected that this imprisonment would have led to a fantastic outcry from the NUJ.

"He was jailed under a law called the Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act.

When it was passed in 2000, the NUJ and others warned that it would lead to the jailing of journalists when they obtained information the state did not want them to obtain.

"We were very righteous about that, but when Goodman was jailed neither the NUJ or anyone else was able to mount a free Clive Goodman campaign.

Content from our partners
MHP Group's 30 To Watch awards for young journalists open for entries
How PA Media is helping newspapers make the digital transition
Publishing on the open web is broken, how generative AI could help fix it

The truth is we have a completely ambivalent attitude to this."We ran a feature in The Journalist saying journalists should not enter this filthy business of stealing people's private information. Then at the same time, I ran another article asking what else journalists could do if the state won't give them any information. Whatchoice do they have but to go snooping around for it?

"I totally agree with both of the arguments.

Incidentally there is an answer — it is the concept of public interest.

When they use surreptitious means, is it in the public interest?

"Let's keep that debate going. It is an important debate at a time [when we face] the possible introduction of a privacy law and the question of regulation of the press by the PCC."

Topics in this article :

Email pged@pressgazette.co.uk to point out mistakes, provide story tips or send in a letter for publication on our "Letters Page" blog

Select and enter your email address Weekly insight into the big strategic issues affecting the future of the news industry. Essential reading for media leaders every Thursday. Your morning brew of news about the world of news from Press Gazette and elsewhere in the media. Sent at around 10am UK time. Our weekly does of strategic insight about the future of news media aimed at US readers. A fortnightly update from the front-line of news and advertising. Aimed at marketers and those involved in the advertising industry.
  • Business owner/co-owner
  • CEO
  • COO
  • CFO
  • CTO
  • Chairperson
  • Non-Exec Director
  • Other C-Suite
  • Managing Director
  • President/Partner
  • Senior Executive/SVP or Corporate VP or equivalent
  • Director or equivalent
  • Group or Senior Manager
  • Head of Department/Function
  • Manager
  • Non-manager
  • Retired
  • Other
Visit our privacy Policy for more information about our services, how New Statesman Media Group may use, process and share your personal data, including information on your rights in respect of your personal data and how you can unsubscribe from future marketing communications.
Thank you

Thanks for subscribing.

Websites in our network