View all newsletters
Sign up for our free email newsletters

Fighting for quality news media in the digital age.

  1. Media Law
April 19, 2013

Labour Lords in new bid to bar companies from suing for libel as Defamation Bill enters Ping Pong stage

By Press Gazette

Labour Lords have introduced a new amendment to the Defamation Bill aimed at restricting the ability of companies to sue for libel.

This clause is the only contentious section left of the Defamation  Bill which is now in the Ping Pong stage – meaning it is will be rapidly batted back and forth between the Lords and the Commons in the coming days and weeks until agreement is reached.

The vast majority of the Bill has been agreed, but this week the Commons rejected a Lords amendment stating that companies could only sue for libel if they could prove financial harm.

The new Labour amendment bids to reinstate the bar on defamation claims by organisations "trading for profit" unless they can show a publication has "caused, or is likely to cause, substantial financial loss to the claimant".

A key change removes the phrase "body corporate" from the contested clause, which was thought likely to cover charities, making it much harder for them to bring defamation cases.

A Ministry of Justice spokesman said: "The Government is concerned that some of the changes made by the Lords are unnecessarily costly and restrictive. This needs to be addressed.

"We understand the strength of feeling over whether corporations should be required to demonstrate serious financial loss. We are actively considering this and will listen carefully to the views of both Houses."

Content from our partners
Free journalism awards for journalists under 30: Deadline today
MHP Group's 30 To Watch awards for young journalists open for entries
How PA Media is helping newspapers make the digital transition

Labour Peer Baroness Hayter said: "Labour's amendments in the Lords are to ensure that the Government lives up to the vocal support it gave to the issue of requiring a threshold of 'substantial financial harm' for organisations trading for profit by supporting this in legislation.

"We also want such bodies to have to have permission of the court to pursue an action, and for organisations providing public services to lose their right to sue.

"The Government's hint of support on the first issue needs to be translated into a concrete amendment."

Topics in this article :

Email pged@pressgazette.co.uk to point out mistakes, provide story tips or send in a letter for publication on our "Letters Page" blog

Select and enter your email address Weekly insight into the big strategic issues affecting the future of the news industry. Essential reading for media leaders every Thursday. Your morning brew of news about the world of news from Press Gazette and elsewhere in the media. Sent at around 10am UK time. Our weekly does of strategic insight about the future of news media aimed at US readers. A fortnightly update from the front-line of news and advertising. Aimed at marketers and those involved in the advertising industry.
  • Business owner/co-owner
  • CEO
  • COO
  • CFO
  • CTO
  • Chairperson
  • Non-Exec Director
  • Other C-Suite
  • Managing Director
  • President/Partner
  • Senior Executive/SVP or Corporate VP or equivalent
  • Director or equivalent
  • Group or Senior Manager
  • Head of Department/Function
  • Manager
  • Non-manager
  • Retired
  • Other
Visit our privacy Policy for more information about our services, how New Statesman Media Group may use, process and share your personal data, including information on your rights in respect of your personal data and how you can unsubscribe from future marketing communications.
Thank you

Thanks for subscribing.

Websites in our network