View all newsletters
Sign up for our free email newsletters

Fighting for quality news media in the digital age.

  1. Archive content
July 10, 2003updated 22 Nov 2022 1:16pm

Keays decision shows breadth of fair comment defence

By Press Gazette

A question frequently faced by journalists and media lawyers is whether a statement is an assertion of fact or a comment. The question is important: in defamation proceedings, the defence of fair comment may be available where a comment or opinion is in issue, with the defendant not then being required to prove its truth. A ruling this month in the case of Sara Keays v Guardian Newspapers Limited demonstrates just how broad the fair comment defence is, applying to statements which until recently many would have categorised as statements of fact.

Whether a statement is a comment or not will often be obvious. However, an area of difficulty for many years was whether a statement about someone’s motive or state of mind could be regarded as a comment. In the 1885 case of Edgington v Fitzmaurice, Lord Justice Bowen memorably stated that “the state of a man’s mind is as much a fact as the state of his digestion”. Without clear legal authority to the contrary, journalists were often advised to limit criticisms to a person’s acts and not to make assertions about a person’s motives. This risked acting as a drag on freedom of expression.

In November 2000, the Court of Appeal in Branson v Bower grasped this nettle. In an important ruling, the court held that assertions published in the Evening Standard about Sir Richard Branson’s motives for bidding for the National Lottery could only be regarded as comment. An important factor in that case was that it was clear to readers that the author could not have had direct knowledge of Branson’s state of mind. He must, therefore, have been expressing his own views and inferences.

In the Sara Keays case, The Observer had published in its comment section a robust article criticising the former mistress of Lord Parkinson for exposing their daughter to media attention. Relying on Branson v Bower, The Observer successfully argued that the words complained of were comment. The author had drawn inferences about Keays’ state of mind which she was not in a position to verify, which would have been clear to readers. The court agreed and held, as in the Branson case, that the words could only be regarded as comment.

Not every assertion of dishonourable motive will be regarded as a comment. For example, where no supporting reasons are stated or referred to, an inference about motive is likely to be treated as an allegation of fact. Nonetheless, the ruling in Keays illustrates that fair comment can provide an important shield when making assertions about someone’s state of mind.

David Attfield is a solicitor in the media group of Lovells, who acted for Guardian Newspapers Limited

Content from our partners
MHP Group's 30 To Watch awards for young journalists open for entries
How PA Media is helping newspapers make the digital transition
Publishing on the open web is broken, how generative AI could help fix it

Email pged@pressgazette.co.uk to point out mistakes, provide story tips or send in a letter for publication on our "Letters Page" blog

Select and enter your email address Weekly insight into the big strategic issues affecting the future of the news industry. Essential reading for media leaders every Thursday. Your morning brew of news about the world of news from Press Gazette and elsewhere in the media. Sent at around 10am UK time. Our weekly does of strategic insight about the future of news media aimed at US readers. A fortnightly update from the front-line of news and advertising. Aimed at marketers and those involved in the advertising industry.
  • Business owner/co-owner
  • CEO
  • COO
  • CFO
  • CTO
  • Chairperson
  • Non-Exec Director
  • Other C-Suite
  • Managing Director
  • President/Partner
  • Senior Executive/SVP or Corporate VP or equivalent
  • Director or equivalent
  • Group or Senior Manager
  • Head of Department/Function
  • Manager
  • Non-manager
  • Retired
  • Other
Visit our privacy Policy for more information about our services, how New Statesman Media Group may use, process and share your personal data, including information on your rights in respect of your personal data and how you can unsubscribe from future marketing communications.
Thank you

Thanks for subscribing.

Websites in our network