View all newsletters
Sign up for our free email newsletters

Fighting for quality news media in the digital age.

  1. Media Law
June 22, 2015

IPSO: Express OK to call children with shotgun permits ‘licensed to kill’ – but wrong to illustrate with handgun picture

By William Turvill and Press Association

A Daily Express headline reporting that children with shotgun permits are "licensed to kill" was acceptable, the Independent Press Standards Organisation has ruled.

But the press regulator upheld a complaint that the Express website was inaccurate to illustrate the story with a picture of a child holding a hangun.

The headline "Licensed to kill at 8" appeared atop a story reporting that more than 670 people under the age of 14 have been given shotgun licences in the last five years. This story was based on Freedom of Information responses.

The complainant, Sean Boyd, said that the headline was inaccurate because holders of shotgun certificates have to act within the law, and nobody is permitted to kill another person.

He also complained that the photograph used to illustrate the online article was misleading because it depicted a child with a handgun of a sort which could only be issued in very rare cases, and never to those under the age of 18.

The newspaper did not accept that the article was inaccurate, noting that it made clear that it referred to shotgun certificates.

It accepted that the photograph with the online article was misleading, and published a clarification on the homepage of its website.

Content from our partners
Free journalism awards for journalists under 30: Deadline today
MHP Group's 30 To Watch awards for young journalists open for entries
How PA Media is helping newspapers make the digital transition

IPSO's complaints committee said the use of an image showing a child reaching for a handgun and the accompanying caption gave the misleading impression that the police were granting gun licences to children for handguns.

Selecting an image of a handgun, rather than a shotgun with which the article was concerned, represented a failure to take care not to publish inaccurate information in breach of Clause 1 (i).

The suggestion that children were being granted handgun licences represented a significant inaccuracy requiring correction.

The correction published online was sufficient to correct the misleading impression given by the photograph.

But it said that Boyd had not disputed that eight year-old children had been granted shotgun certificates and therefore had access to dangerous weapons, albeit supervised.

The newspaper was entitled to characterise the granting of these certificates as offering children "a licence to kill".

Topics in this article : ,

Email pged@pressgazette.co.uk to point out mistakes, provide story tips or send in a letter for publication on our "Letters Page" blog

Select and enter your email address Weekly insight into the big strategic issues affecting the future of the news industry. Essential reading for media leaders every Thursday. Your morning brew of news about the world of news from Press Gazette and elsewhere in the media. Sent at around 10am UK time. Our weekly does of strategic insight about the future of news media aimed at US readers. A fortnightly update from the front-line of news and advertising. Aimed at marketers and those involved in the advertising industry.
  • Business owner/co-owner
  • CEO
  • COO
  • CFO
  • CTO
  • Chairperson
  • Non-Exec Director
  • Other C-Suite
  • Managing Director
  • President/Partner
  • Senior Executive/SVP or Corporate VP or equivalent
  • Director or equivalent
  • Group or Senior Manager
  • Head of Department/Function
  • Manager
  • Non-manager
  • Retired
  • Other
Visit our privacy Policy for more information about our services, how New Statesman Media Group may use, process and share your personal data, including information on your rights in respect of your personal data and how you can unsubscribe from future marketing communications.
Thank you

Thanks for subscribing.

Websites in our network