View all newsletters
Sign up for our free email newsletters

Fighting for quality news media in the digital age.

  1. Media Law
July 6, 2012updated 14 Sep 2012 4:04pm

Hacking is ‘tip of the iceberg’ in data black market

By PA Mediapoint

 

  • Calls to regulate private investigators
  • Sever the links between police forces and private investigators, say MPS
  • Vaz: 'Rogue private investigators are the brokers in a black market in information'

Phone-hacking is the tip of the iceberg of a substantial black market in personal information, according to MPs.

Rogue private investigators are using tracking and recording devices easily available online to cash in on people's private lives and escape with paltry fines, the Commons Home Affairs Select Committee said.

A robust licensing and registration system for private investigators should be set up as soon as possible and the Government must act to sever the links between private investigators and the police, the MPs said.

"Personal data is easier than ever to access and a private profile of a person can be built from a desktop," their report into private investigators said.

"The ease of access has also opened the information market to new and unscrupulous suppliers, who may not be registered with the Information Commissioner and are unlikely to understand the rules under which they ought to operate.

"Phone-hacking appears to be the tip of the iceberg of a substantial black market in personal information."

Content from our partners
MHP Group's 30 To Watch awards for young journalists open for entries
How PA Media is helping newspapers make the digital transition
Publishing on the open web is broken, how generative AI could help fix it

Keith Vaz, the committee's chairman, added: "We have found that rogue private investigators are the brokers in a black market in information.

"They illegally snoop on our data, cash in on our private lives and only get away with a paltry fine.

"The public must be assured that those acting as 'private investigators' are subject to stringent checks, act under a code of conduct, and will face tough penalties if they step out of line."

The committee also called for the Government to sever the links between police forces and private investigators, with both parties having to formally record any contact.

There should also be a one-year cooling-off period between retirement from the police force and working in private investigation, the committee said.

Vaz added: "It is time this industry was regulated, so that the honest majority can get on with their work. We expect the Government to act urgently."

The MPs said they heard "troubling allegations" that investigators were maintaining close links with officers in order to "garner 'premium' information that commands the highest prices".

"These links appear to go beyond one-off contacts and therefore to constitute an unacknowledged, but deep-rooted intertwining of a private and unregulated industry with our police forces," they said.

The committee called for the police watchdog, the Independent Police Complaints Commission (IPCC), to take direct control over investigations in cases alleging police corruption.

Home Secretary Theresa May should also strengthen the penalties available for offences relating to the unlawful obtaining, disclosure and selling of personal data, the MPs said.

"The current fine – typically around £100 – is derisory," the committee said.

"It is simply not an effective deterrent."

A Home Office spokesman said: "We will carefully consider the committee's report.

"Given the relevance of this issue to the matters being considered by the Leveson Inquiry, we will await its findings to ensure they can be taken into account in the development of a suitably effective regulatory regime.

"Private investigators remain subject to the law on intercepting communications like everyone else."

Emma Carr, deputy director of the campaign group Big Brother Watch, said: "It is absolutely right that people selling surveillance and investigating services are properly regulated and are held to account.

"For any regulation to work there must be a proper deterrent.

"Until jail sentences can be handed out to those who deliberately obtain sensitive information that they are not entitled to, the public cannot be sure that their privacy is adequately protected."

Topics in this article :

Email pged@pressgazette.co.uk to point out mistakes, provide story tips or send in a letter for publication on our "Letters Page" blog

Select and enter your email address Weekly insight into the big strategic issues affecting the future of the news industry. Essential reading for media leaders every Thursday. Your morning brew of news about the world of news from Press Gazette and elsewhere in the media. Sent at around 10am UK time. Our weekly does of strategic insight about the future of news media aimed at US readers. A fortnightly update from the front-line of news and advertising. Aimed at marketers and those involved in the advertising industry.
  • Business owner/co-owner
  • CEO
  • COO
  • CFO
  • CTO
  • Chairperson
  • Non-Exec Director
  • Other C-Suite
  • Managing Director
  • President/Partner
  • Senior Executive/SVP or Corporate VP or equivalent
  • Director or equivalent
  • Group or Senior Manager
  • Head of Department/Function
  • Manager
  • Non-manager
  • Retired
  • Other
Visit our privacy Policy for more information about our services, how New Statesman Media Group may use, process and share your personal data, including information on your rights in respect of your personal data and how you can unsubscribe from future marketing communications.
Thank you

Thanks for subscribing.

Websites in our network