View all newsletters
Sign up for our free email newsletters

Fighting for quality news media in the digital age.

  1. Media Law
May 30, 2013

Government under pressure to drop new Freedom of Information proposals

By William Turvill

More freedom of information requests are likely to be refused as vexatious under new guidance, the Campaign for Freedom of Information has warned.

The group has said the guidelines remove the Government’s case for introducing new restrictions and has called for the plans to be dropped.

In November last year the Government proposed a series of changes to the FoI Act to make it easier for requests to be seen as “disproportionately burdensome” and refused.

The campaign group claims the changes would increase the chances of all requests being blocked – and not just the targeted group of people who make excessive use of the Act.

In particular, the campaign group is critical of the proposal to lower the cost limit at which public authorities can refuse a request. The cost limit currently stands at £600 for Government departments and £450 for other bodies.

Campaign director Maurice Frankel said: “Any request raising new, complex or contentious issues would be at risk of being refused, simply because of the time needed to consider unfamiliar issues.

“If FoI staff are inexperienced they will need still more time to deal with complex requests, increasing the chances of a cost refusal.

Content from our partners
MHP Group's 30 To Watch awards for young journalists open for entries
How PA Media is helping newspapers make the digital transition
Publishing on the open web is broken, how generative AI could help fix it

“Some authorities might deliberately claim they have to consult more widely than is strictly necessary to ensure that the cost exceeds the limit.

“Critically, cost refusals take no account of the public interest in disclosure – so many important requests could be refused.”

The campaign has also criticised the proposal to allow for individuals’ separate FoI questions to be considered together in terms of cost – thereby making them easier to be refused.

The Government has also proposed that there should be charges for the cost of appealing to the tribunal over an FoI rejection, according to the group.

The campaign has written to Justice minister Lord McNally and is urging MPs to sign an early day motion put forward by Conservative MP and FoI campaigner Sir Richard Shepherd. It calls on the Government to ditch its proposals.

In it, Shepherd “expresses concern that requests by those making moderate use of the legislation will also be more easily refused under the proposals”.

The motion also states that it “is particularly concerned at the proposal that the time which authorities spend considering whether to release information should be taken into account when calculating whether the cost limit has been reached”.

It adds “that this proposal was expressly rejected by the Justice Committee in its post-legislative review of the Act” and “believes that this proposal will penalise requests raising new or complex issues which will inevitably require substantial time to consider”.

The EDM has so far been signed by 22 MPs across all major political parties.

Topics in this article : ,

Email pged@pressgazette.co.uk to point out mistakes, provide story tips or send in a letter for publication on our "Letters Page" blog

Select and enter your email address Weekly insight into the big strategic issues affecting the future of the news industry. Essential reading for media leaders every Thursday. Your morning brew of news about the world of news from Press Gazette and elsewhere in the media. Sent at around 10am UK time. Our weekly does of strategic insight about the future of news media aimed at US readers. A fortnightly update from the front-line of news and advertising. Aimed at marketers and those involved in the advertising industry.
  • Business owner/co-owner
  • CEO
  • COO
  • CFO
  • CTO
  • Chairperson
  • Non-Exec Director
  • Other C-Suite
  • Managing Director
  • President/Partner
  • Senior Executive/SVP or Corporate VP or equivalent
  • Director or equivalent
  • Group or Senior Manager
  • Head of Department/Function
  • Manager
  • Non-manager
  • Retired
  • Other
Visit our privacy Policy for more information about our services, how New Statesman Media Group may use, process and share your personal data, including information on your rights in respect of your personal data and how you can unsubscribe from future marketing communications.
Thank you

Thanks for subscribing.

Websites in our network