View all newsletters
Sign up for our free email newsletters

Fighting for quality news media in the digital age.

  1. Archive content
March 20, 2003updated 17 May 2007 11:30am

BoS faces big legal bill in council libel action

By Press Gazette

BoS: awaiting Court of Appeal’s decision on costs

Legal costs in the long-running libel case in which three Bedfordshire Borough Council officers sued Bedfordshire on Sunday and a Conservative Party agent are likely to top £1m.

The latest twist in the case came last week when the Court of Appeal overturned the decision of Mr Justice Gray at a trial of libel proceedings and allowed an appeal by Michael Gough, a solicitor and head of corporate administration at Bedford Borough Council (Press Gazette, 14 March).

Gough will now be awarded damages and costs from the Court of Appeal, to be determined at a later hearing. He said: “I am delighted at the outcome of the appeal and that three appeal judges have vindicated me.”

Gough sued Bedfordshire on Sunday and Stewart Lister, then the Conservative Party agent in Bedford, over an article and press release published in May 2000 accusing him of incompetence in his handling of a court application relating to a ward election in which postal votes were not counted.

At the 13-day libel trial in 2002, Mr Justice Gray found against Gough. But the Court of Appeal has decided that “the allegation against Mr Gough of incompetence cannot be held to be justified”.

Content from our partners
MHP Group's 30 To Watch awards for young journalists open for entries
How PA Media is helping newspapers make the digital transition
Publishing on the open web is broken, how generative AI could help fix it

Last year’s trial also involved Bedford Borough Council chief executive Shaun Field, who recovered £52,500 from the defendants, part of which resulted from a settlement before the trial. A third council officer, Andrew Darkoh, a barrister in the legal department, lost at the trial and has not appealed.

Peter Carter-Ruck and Partners, which represented Gough, Field and Darkoh, said in a statement last week: “It is likely that Bedfordshire on Sunday and Stewart Lister will face legal bills in excess of £1m.”

The legal firm added: “The case represents another success for Carter-Ruck’s conditional fee agreement scheme.”

Bedfordshire on Sunday responded: “The costs of the action have not yet been decided and will form the subject of another hearing. Our legal advice differs markedly from speculation in the press release issued on behalf of Mr Gough.”

By Jon Slattery

Topics in this article :

Email pged@pressgazette.co.uk to point out mistakes, provide story tips or send in a letter for publication on our "Letters Page" blog

Select and enter your email address Weekly insight into the big strategic issues affecting the future of the news industry. Essential reading for media leaders every Thursday. Your morning brew of news about the world of news from Press Gazette and elsewhere in the media. Sent at around 10am UK time. Our weekly does of strategic insight about the future of news media aimed at US readers. A fortnightly update from the front-line of news and advertising. Aimed at marketers and those involved in the advertising industry.
  • Business owner/co-owner
  • CEO
  • COO
  • CFO
  • CTO
  • Chairperson
  • Non-Exec Director
  • Other C-Suite
  • Managing Director
  • President/Partner
  • Senior Executive/SVP or Corporate VP or equivalent
  • Director or equivalent
  • Group or Senior Manager
  • Head of Department/Function
  • Manager
  • Non-manager
  • Retired
  • Other
Visit our privacy Policy for more information about our services, how New Statesman Media Group may use, process and share your personal data, including information on your rights in respect of your personal data and how you can unsubscribe from future marketing communications.
Thank you

Thanks for subscribing.

Websites in our network