View all newsletters
Sign up for our free email newsletters

Fighting for quality news media in the digital age.

  1. Archive content
February 21, 2002updated 17 May 2007 11:30am

Attorney General to rule on Panter

By Press Gazette

The Attorney General is to decide whether the Manchester Evening News reporter who named the man suspected of the IRA bombing of the city should face trial for contempt.

At a hearing at Manchester Crown Court last week, Mr Justice Leveson decided he would not deal with the matter himself but would refer the papers to the Attorney General.

During the trial of a police officer thought to have leaked the name of the suspected bomber to the MEN’s Steve Panter, the judge had ordered the reporter to disclose his source for the story.

Panter refused and was declared in contempt of the court by the judge.

The latest legal moves mean he would be a defendant with the right of appeal if he were charged, rather than a witness.

After hearing the news, MEN editor Paul Horrocks told Press Gazette: "We’ll be very disappointed if a prosecution is mounted because we strongly believe it is not in the public interest to pursue this case.

Content from our partners
MHP Group's 30 To Watch awards for young journalists open for entries
How PA Media is helping newspapers make the digital transition
Publishing on the open web is broken, how generative AI could help fix it

"When you look at the background to this, we have had a prime suspect identified but not arrested; a police officer prosecuted and found to be innocent; and now we’ve got the prospect of a possible contempt action against a journalist. At the end, nobody is going to stand trial at this stage for the bombing."

At a hearing on Friday, the police officer involved, Gordon Mutch, was ordered to pay £10,000 of his own defence costs. Horrocks said the case was reported to have cost hundreds of thousands of pounds in legal fees.

Thirteen MPs have signed an Early Day Motion in the House of Commons supporting journalists who refuse to disclose sources of information and regretting that they may face contempt proceedings as a result.

They want a clarification of Section 10 of the European Convention on Human Rights about protection of journalists’ sources.

By Jean Morgan

Email pged@pressgazette.co.uk to point out mistakes, provide story tips or send in a letter for publication on our "Letters Page" blog

Select and enter your email address Weekly insight into the big strategic issues affecting the future of the news industry. Essential reading for media leaders every Thursday. Your morning brew of news about the world of news from Press Gazette and elsewhere in the media. Sent at around 10am UK time. Our weekly does of strategic insight about the future of news media aimed at US readers. A fortnightly update from the front-line of news and advertising. Aimed at marketers and those involved in the advertising industry.
  • Business owner/co-owner
  • CEO
  • COO
  • CFO
  • CTO
  • Chairperson
  • Non-Exec Director
  • Other C-Suite
  • Managing Director
  • President/Partner
  • Senior Executive/SVP or Corporate VP or equivalent
  • Director or equivalent
  • Group or Senior Manager
  • Head of Department/Function
  • Manager
  • Non-manager
  • Retired
  • Other
Visit our privacy Policy for more information about our services, how New Statesman Media Group may use, process and share your personal data, including information on your rights in respect of your personal data and how you can unsubscribe from future marketing communications.
Thank you

Thanks for subscribing.

Websites in our network